October 15, 2013
In Doctor calls for secret filming ban after ACA sting the Age reports on a complaint by a Queensland doctor to a story run by A Current Affair regarding certificates issued on, supposedly, weak grounds. The nub of the complaint is Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy, Privacy Articles
|
Post a comment »
In Fisher v Houston [2013] FCA 1026 Tracey J made orders regarding the award of costs associated with an application for preliminary discovery. The context of the preliminary discovery application relating to a potential claim under the Privacy Act 1988. I was junior counsel for the Applicant in this proceeding.
FACTS
The prospective applicant (“Fisher”) has a mobile telephone but only provided the number to a limited group of persons. In March 2012 he received a call on his mobile telephone from a journalist, the prospective respondent (“Houston”). Houston asked Fisher for a comment about a legal proceeding in which a business associate of Fisher’s was involved [1] Fisher never Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Australian decisions, Federal Court, Practice and Procedure, Privacy
|
Post a comment »
October 14, 2013
The Supreme Court considered an urgent application for an interlucotury injunction in a privacy related matter in Candy v Bauer Media Limited [2013] NSWSC 979. The urgent application was made on 20 July 2013 with the decision made and reasons published that same day.
FACTS
The plaintif, Holly Rachel Candy, is better known in Australia by her Maiden Name, Holly Valance. Sometime Soapie star who later developed a musical, and occasional movie, career. Now a celebrity in the UK married to a wealthy businessman. For those consumers of gossip magazines and celebrity websites this is almost trite. Nevertheless it is not knowledge that would be regarded as notorious and it does not seem to have made its way into the affidavit material with his Honour stating:
- The plaintiff is an actress. She is an Australian Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in General, Legal, New South Wales Supreme Court, Privacy
|
Post a comment »
Practice Note CM 17 released on 1 August 2011, taking effect on 9 October 2013. It is found here. It is identical to the revoked CM 17. Both notes are identical except regarding the Opt Out Notice, Form 21. The media release explains the changes as
On 9 October 2013 the Chief Justice revoked Approved Form 21 – Opt Out Notice approved for the purposes of the Federal Court Rules 2011. At the same time he approved a revised version of this form.
The amendment to this form inserts an address to which the completed form should be sent
The practice note provides:
1. Introduction
1.1 This Practice Note Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Legal, Practice and Procedure
|
Post a comment »
October 11, 2013
There are a few things predictable in the world; death, taxes and Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in General, Privacy
|
Post a comment »
October 9, 2013
Today the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner released the report on a survey conducted on the community attitudes to Privacy. The survey itself can be found here. The pdf version of the report can be found here.
The Section 4, containing the detailed findings, provides:
4.0 Detailed findings
This study of community attitudes to privacy covered a number of key areas, namely:
Posted in General, Privacy
|
Comments Off on Office of the Information Commissioner releases community attitudes to privacy survey research report 2013
October 8, 2013
The ALRC released its issues paper Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era today.The closing date for submissions is 11 November 2013. I am sure there is no symbolism in it being Armistice Day or, as known in France, the Day of Dupes (or the anniversary of Ned Kelly’s execution). It is found here.
The media release (found here) provides:
The Australian Law Reform Commission (ALRC) today released the Issues Paper, Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era(ALRC Issues Paper 43, 2013), to begin the consultation process for Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
October 7, 2013
In November 2012 a consultant psychiatrist lost a bag while riding home. Disappointing and frustrating no doubt but in and of itself normally nothing dramatic there. Except if the bag contained sensitive personal data. A consultant psychiatrist working for the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board did just that. And for these troubles it has been the subject to an undertaking from the Information Commissioner’s Office.
The press release provides:
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has issued Cardiff and Vale University Health Board with an undertaking following a breach of the Data Protection Act.
The breach occurred Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in General, Privacy
|
Post a comment »
October 3, 2013
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
October 2, 2013
On 27 September 2013 the Privacy Commissioner issued Guidelines for recognising external dispute resolution schemes under section 35A of the Privacy Act 1988. It is part of the Privacy Commissioner’s roll out of guidelines, codes and policies in anticipation of the amendments to the Privacy Act coming into effect on 12 March 2014. It is very commendable and entirely appropriate. The real test is the approach the Privacy Commissioner takes once he is armed Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Commonwealth Privacy Commissioner, Privacy
|
Post a comment »