April 22, 2014
The World Today has reported on the coverage by most media outlets in photographing the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge enjoying private time on private property, the Government House at Yarralumla, yesterday. Quite disappointing given the World Today reports in Privacy debate swirls after Royal pics published that media outlets were specifically asked to respect the Royals privacy. That request was clearly ignored.
The story provides:
ASHLEY HALL: A move by sections of the Australian media to broadcast private footage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince George has sparked another privacy debate.
The Royals are spending the afternoon in the Red Centre today. Yesterday was an official rest day, which they spent in the grounds of Government House at Yarralumla in Canberra.
But despite the appeals for privacy, images of the Duchess playing with her son and walking hand in hand with Prince William were broadcast on television news services last night and printed in Australian newspapers this morning.
The media outlets ignored a request from Kensington Palace not to use the images, as Stephanie Smail reports.
STEPHANIE SMAIL: Photographs and footage of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and their bouncing baby boy have flooded the Australian media since they arrived last week.
Their official outings have Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
1 Comment »
April 20, 2014
On 26 January 2014, in Another data breach involving large US arts and crafts retailer, I posted on Michaels a craft chain store detecting a data breach. It had notified the FBI and was investigating. There has been some further information provided. In Michaels says nearly 3 million customers hit by data breach, the Washington Post reports that the data breach involved the theft of information from 3 million customers. What is clear from the story is that the information security system was woefully inadequate and remained so for a month after the announcement of the data breach.
It provides:
Michaels has confirmed that credit and debit card information was stolen from 3 million customers who shopped at some of its stores during an eight-month period.
The craft-store chain initially confirmed Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
April 17, 2014
In Canadian teen arrested for stealing tax data with Heartbleed the Age reports on a verifiable misuse of Heartbleed to steel personal data from the Canadian Revenue Agency.
It provides:
Canadian police have arrested a 19-year-old man and charged him in connection with exploiting the Heartbleed bug to steal taxpayer data from a government website.
In what appeared to be the first report of an attack using a flaw in software known as OpenSSL, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) said this week about 900 social insurance numbers and possibly other data had been compromised as a result of an attack on its site.
The suspect, Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
The UK Telegraph reports in Hackers steal 500k patient records from Harley Medical Group that personal information relating to 480,000 patients of the Harley Medical Group have been accessed by hackers. Medical records are defined as sensitive information in the Privacy Act 1988. They are universally regarded as very confidential and the breach or misuse of medical files is generally regarded as in the category of the most serious privacy breaches. Doctor patient confidentiality is part of the canon of medical ethics, has long been recognised at common law and, relatively, more recently received statutory recognition. That of course doesn’t prevent general practitioners and surgeons to make mistakes with patient records. Where the real problems arise is the management of records by private health organisations, be they medical groups, insurers, hospitals or agencies and departments. With those groups there is a danger of treating patient records as just another form of data. Which they are most definitely not. Regulators take a very dim view of data breaches of medical records. As they should. It will be interesting to see how the Privacy Commissioner exercises his newly acquired powers when there is a breach of medical confidentiality through a breach of security or other form of interferences with privacy.
The article provides:
The personal details of nearly half a million people considering cosmetic surgery may have been accessed by hackers Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
April 11, 2014
The Age in Personal data exposed by ACCC security lapse reports on a privacy breach by the ACCC.
It provides:
Australia’s competition regulator has been hit with an embarrassing security lapse after its confidential email subscriber list was accidentally displayed on the internet.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
April 3, 2014
On 31 March 2014 the Australian Retail Credit Association (the “ARCA”) has applied to vary the Credit Reporting Code to extend from 5 days to 14 day grace period for repayment history to be classified as a missed payment.
The Privacy Commissioner is considering the application. It is unlikely that he will reject it. It is a pro consumer amendment being sought by the ARCA.
The CR Code is found here
Posted in Commonwealth Privacy Commissioner
|
Post a comment »
April 2, 2014
The Economist has taken a keen interest in drone technology of late and has had an abiding interest in technology. Those two themes come together in Eyes in the skies which looks at the use of unmanned aerial vehicles by journalists. The article also deals briefly with the privacy issues.
It provides:
THE news footage is striking: fires burn on the streets of Kiev; scorched banners flutter on buildings; madding crowds stumble through the chaos below. It is also strange: although aerial, it does not look as if it was shot from a helicopter. The camera flies right up to burning buildings; people on the ground so Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
April 1, 2014
One of the key issues with the interpretation of the Australian Privacy Principles is the extent to which organisations will need to keep up to date with data security protocols, programs and preventative methods to avoid a hacking attack. The fact that an organisation is hacked does not mean, ipso facto, it has not complied with the APPs. That said a breach Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
March 31, 2014
In 2009 the newly minted President of the United States, President Obama, spoke to some school children and cautioned them about what they put on Facebook. It is reported by the Huffington Post in Obama On Facebook: “Be Careful What You Post”.
At that time he said:
“Whatever you do,” he told them, “it will be pulled up later in your life.”
Prescient comments then and equally applicable today, if not more so with Big Data and sophisticated algorithims. Advice that is not heeded by those who take selfies after sex, as reported in Why are couples taking #aftersex selfies? A spectacularly stupid practice at any age.
In the Age’s article Online: Parents urged to be careful with child-related information the issue covered relates to Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »
Ars Technica reports in Philips Smart TVs wide open to Gmail cookie theft, other serious hacks regarding serious security flaws that could allow hackers to steal information from attached USB sticks and pilfer authentication cookies which could give them access to Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Privacy
|
Post a comment »