April 12, 2012
Today Justice Beach, in Barrow v McLernon & Anor  VSC 134 handed down a very interesting and useful decision regarding discovery and the operation of section 27 of the Civil Procedure Act. It is an appeal from a decision of an Associate Justice.
The Plaintiff is suing Hugh McLernon and IMF (Australia) Limited for defamation arising out of the publication on 30 May 2011 of an email and two pdf attachments . The Plaintiff wishes to use documents discovered in this proceeding in support of issuing other proceedings, also a cause of action in defamation . Five documents discovered constitute Read the rest of this entry »
June 6, 2011
On 3 June Hargrave J made an interim ruling as to the further conduct proceedings in Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Scully & Ors (No 2) (Scully). It is an important decision in considering the approach the court should take to civil prosecutions brought by the Director of Consumer affairs under the Fair trading Act.
The proceedings relate to two schemes promoted by Scully and others designed to allow consumers with financial problems to acquire their own home without a deposit or finance from banks or financial institutions in the short term . The Director brought an action under sections 9, 11 and 12 of the Fair Trading Act in the public interest and representing the interests of certain individuals who participated in the schemes. There were no pleadings and Associate Justice Daley dismissed an application to order a statement of claim [10 at footnote 1].
On 10 May 2011 the trial was adjourned, part heard, until 26 July 2011. The court called the parties back because of concerns as to the course the trial was taking. His Honour was concerned that since the proceedings had been issued the nature of the allegations were contained across and originating motion, numbering 50 pages but drawn in broad terms, voluminous affidavit material, running to 11,000 pages over 26 volumes, and written outline of submissions which was at “..a high level of generality” . As a consequence the court was reliant upon the Director and his legal representatives to identify his case, which the did not occur in the first four days of trial . His Honour was quite critical of the assistance provided by the Director (see ) saying “..the Court requires significantly greater assistance from the Director than has been provided to date.”
The court was of the view that pleadings were necessary to define the many issues in the case and avoid possible injustice to the defendants ( – ).
At  the Court cited Mason and Gauldron’s statement in Banque Commerciale SA v Akhil Holdings Ltd that the function of pleadings “..is to Read the rest of this entry »