Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, Central District of California

September 1, 2015 |

Damages for privacy related breaches is a vexed issue. What is the loss is often raised by defendants even if the breach is established.  The measure of damages is an area of development in the United Kingdom. In a recent Federal case of Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services a jury awarded the plaintiff $250,000 for creditworthiness loss, $150,000 for emotional distress and a civil penalty of $300,000 for violition of identity theft law. The case has been reported in Federal Jury in Los Angeles Finds Against BMW Financial Services with Verdict of $430,000 for Credit Reporting and Identity Theft Violations.  It provides:

A federal jury has just imposed a verdict of $430,000 upon BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the California Identity Theft Law. The lawsuit, Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, alleged that BMW Financial failed to properly handle plaintiff Seungtae Kim’s identity theft claim, and thereafter damaged him by continuing to report a derogatory identity theft account on his otherwise perfect credit profile; plaintiff was represented by Robert F. Brennan, Esq., of La Crescenta, California.

federal jury today found against BMW Financial Services with a unanimous verdict for violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the California Identity Theft Law. Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, Central District of California. In its verdict form, the jury assessed damages of $250,000 for damages to creditworthiness and reputation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, as well as additional damages of $150,000 for emotional distress and mental anguish under the California Identity Theft Law. The jury also assessed a civil penalty of $30,000.00 for a willful violation of the California Identity Theft Law.

As alleged in the lawsuit, in 2013 plaintiff Seungtae Kim, a Korean acupuncture doctor in Los Angeles, discovered four identity theft accounts on his credit report. Through contacting the creditors and working with the police, he was able to clear up three of the accounts, but the fourth account, BMW Financial, insisted that the false information resulted from a “straw purchase,” where Mr. Kim had consented to let someone else use his identity to buy a car.

Following the verdict, Mr. Kim expressed great relief. “I felt like I was up against a brick wall,” commented Mr. Kim, “and had no other option than to file a lawsuit to clear my name and my reputation. Corporations should never be allowed to do this to someone.”

Plaintiff’s attorney Robert F. Brennan of La Crescenta commented, “Financial corporations like BMW Financial really have little concept of the enormous power that they enjoy with quick, easy computerized credit reporting. The power to credit report is the power to destroy, and I hope that BMW Financial, and other corporations, learn that they must, must take their credit reporting and identity theft responsibilities very seriously.”

One Response to “Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, Central District of California”

  1. Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, Central District of California | Australian Law Blogs

    […] Seungtae Kim v. BMW Financial Services, NA, LLC, Case No. 2:14–cv–01752–BRO–SH, Central Dist… […]

Leave a Reply





Verified by MonsterInsights